|
Posted 8/25/2004 5:36:06 AM |
|
|
Junior Member
Last Login: 5/10/2004 1:36:09 AM
Posts: 16,
Visits: 0
|
|
It's no secret everyone here likes the 1989 batmobile.
But which one do you guys like/can tolerate between the other two?
This:
That:
|
|
|
Posted 8/25/2004 11:21:39 AM |
|
|
Forum Member
Last Login: 5/10/2004 1:37:16 AM
Posts: 187,
Visits: 0
|
|
the forever batmobile out of the 2
|
|
|
Posted 8/25/2004 2:12:25 PM |
|
|
Forum Member
Last Login: 5/10/2004 1:37:47 AM
Posts: 102,
Visits: 0
|
|
The Forever vehicle is okay except I hate the front fenders...
|
|
|
Posted 8/25/2004 2:47:43 PM |
|
|
Junior Member
Last Login: 5/10/2004 1:37:47 AM
Posts: 62,
Visits: 0
|
|
I don't mind the Forever Batmobile. Obviously it is cooler than that Phalic looking B&R crap. In fact, I would someday like to own a Forever car, when I have a little less to deal with on my plate.
|
|
|
Posted 8/25/2004 4:36:22 PM |
|
|
Forum Member
Last Login: 5/10/2004 1:37:20 AM
Posts: 150,
Visits: 0
|
|
If anything, '89 mobile is more phallic looking than anything else.
|
|
|
Posted 8/25/2004 6:12:31 PM |
|
|
Junior Member
Last Login: 5/10/2004 1:37:30 AM
Posts: 74,
Visits: 0
|
|
Although I am still a big fan of the '89 batwagon, I would have to be the oddball and choose the B&R car over the Forever hot rod. My opinion though.
|
|
|
Posted 9/7/2004 1:58:00 PM |
|
|
Forum Member
Last Login: 5/10/2004 1:36:19 AM
Posts: 123,
Visits: 0
|
|
B&R Batmobile for me( as long as it doesn't come with disco lights)
Forever mobile's wobbling fin is just wrong and also cause unncessary height problem.
|
|
|
|